• Home
  • About

Evan Sparks's Aviation Policy Blog

A wonk's-eye view of everything in the sky.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Merger myths busted
DOJ OKs TPG & YX »

Airline mergers: a guide to the antitrust landscape

January 30, 2008 by Evan Sparks

Any prospective airline merger will have no small obstacle in the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, which assesses the potential competitive effects of tie-ups. If it finds fault with a coupling, its threat to sue is usually enough to deep-six the merger plan.

DOJ reviews every proposed merger according to its Horizontal Merger Guidelines:

The Guidelines describe the analytical process that the Agency will employ in determining whether to challenge a horizontal merger. First, the Agency assesses whether the merger would significantly increase concentration and result in a concentrated market, properly defined and measured. Second, the Agency assesses whether the merger, in light of market concentration and other factors that characterize the market, raises concern about potential adverse competitive effects. Third, the Agency assesses whether entry would be timely, likely and sufficient either to deter or to counteract the competitive effects of concern. Fourth, the Agency assesses any efficiency gains that reasonably cannot be achieved by the parties through other means. Finally the Agency assesses whether, but for the merger, either party to the transaction would be likely to fail, causing its assets to exit the market.

In 2005, just after the US Airways-America West merger (which did not raise regulatory hackles), then-deputy assistant attorney general Bruce McDonald offered a helpful explanation of how the Justice Department applies these guidelines. First, it identifies the city-pairs served by each airline in the mix, then calculates the share that a merged airline would have. It focuses on specific markets in which competition is likely to be constrained (usually hub cities or markets close to the airlines’ hubs).

But to stop there assumes that the air service remains static. If a merged airline enjoyed a near monopoly in a particular market, it might be ripe for new entrants to reintroduce successful competition. It might not be either. The department weighs several factors affecting the likelihood of new entrants.

The department also makes special considerations. For example, it might be more willing to approve a questionable merger if one of the parties is near bankruptcy–like when American bought TWA.

Over the next couple weeks, I’ll be looking at some of the proposed mergers, especially Delta-Northwest and Delta-United, in the context of these conditions. Will they pass the antitrust test?

Posts in this series:

  • Delta-Northwest
  • United-Continental
  • United-US Airways
Advertisement

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Evan's Commentary | Tagged Merger Mania 2008, mergers, regulation |

  • Recently on the APB

    • America vs. Europe: who overrates whom?
    • Scare headline not so scary in article
    • Crew rest and training, new ATC contract, and more
    • The solution to NYC’s airport woes?
    • And… I’m back
    • Nothing to see here
    • Let your left hand not know what your right hand is doing….
    • Evan around the web
    • This is just ridiculous
    • Liveblogging Randy Babbitt’s confirmation hearing
  • 2008 aerospace airports air traffic control alitalia american asia ata atsb australia pacific Aviation08 BAA british airways budget airlines business canada competition congress consumer advocacy continental delays delta Deregulation 2.0 dot emirates energy environment europe faa fedex general aviation geography health history humor iata icao klm korean labor latin america lufthansa media Merger Mania 2008 mergers meta middle east middle east/africa military misc. nationalism network airlines northwest open skies politics prestige regulation ryanair safety sarcasm security small communities southwest Southwest and the FAA space tax transit travel tsa united usa us airways virgin virgin america world
  • Archives

    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
  • Find me on Facebook!
  • Banner photo: Washington during landing at National Airport, November 2007. © Rachel Ayerst. Used by permission.

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Evan Sparks's Aviation Policy Blog
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Evan Sparks's Aviation Policy Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: