• Home
  • About

Evan Sparks's Aviation Policy Blog

A wonk's-eye view of everything in the sky.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Kansas City weighs airport light rail
FAA orders peak pricing . . . sort of »

The collar-color identity crisis of the airline pilot

July 14, 2008 by Evan Sparks

As I was preparing this post, I noticed that Sean O’Neill at This Just In has written something similar. So, go read his work, then come back here for further reflections.

Commercial airline pilots: blue-collar or white-collar? Working class or middle class? (Never mind the fact that “working class” and “middle class” are swiftly becoming relics of a past era of social stratification.)

In the white-collar column: pilots are professionals who require a government license to practice. They are required to have bachelor degrees. Although less so today, in the past, they often came from the military officers corps, whose members tend to exit into middle-class lives. And commercial airline pilots enjoy an average annual wage of $148,810.

In the blue-collar column: pilots are operators of machinery. They have strict uniforms and ranks. They are organized into highly regimented seniority structures. They are unionized. They are paid by the hour. They are highly vulnerable to layoffs and furloughs. And they start their careers making less than $20,000 per year in many cases.

Indeed, the airline pilot is a strange blend of blue and white collars, as if he washed his colors with his whites. As one of Patrick Smith’s correspondents writes, “Pilots are a weird blend of white- and blue-collar, neither tradesmen nor professionals, and the usual definitions don’t apply. What do you call someone who spends tens of thousands of dollars on his own training, then endures years in an ill-paid apprenticeship, in a notoriously unstable industry, cemented into a seniority system, unable to freelance or change companies? I don’t know, but it’s not a professional. Of course, neither are we true blue-collar workers, who at least have transferable skills. And I suspect the ubiquitous seniority system, originally set up to protect pilots from capricious promotions and demotions, may be our greatest hindrance.” The seniority system is a holy grail of the unions.

It’s clear that unions introduce inefficiencies into labor markets. I tend to think, however, that the costs of unions are worth it, because they channel passions that flare up violently in other countries into democratic and peaceful means of negotiation. But I also think that excessive unionization (as in France, for example, or pre-Thatcher Britain) can dangerously gum up the economy. I’m also cheered by falling rates of union membership, which is as often as not a token of the growth in entrepreneurial business ventures that make hash of the dichotomy between “worker” and “owner.”

And it is becoming increasingly clear that unionization does not benefit all workers as much as entrenched workers. Just as businesses prefer regulation and cartelization to protect themselves against competition from new entrants, so senior workers often prefer unionization to protect themselves against wage and performance competition by new entrants into the workforce. As Adam Smith writes: “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.”

Take that generous average pilot salary, for example. One hundred fifty thousand dollars is not chump change. But that’s an average, which is not particularly useful in statistics because a few high outliers can artificially skew the sample. Number-crunchers tend to prefer working with medians, but the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not provide those median figures in full. What has happened in airline labor negotiations is that, over time, incumbent pilots’ pay has suffered less than pay for new hires. This happened fairly often during the productivity drives of the 1980s: an airline would sweeten the deal for pilots already in the system while dramatically cutting pay for new hires. In this way, the pilots unions worked against their future members’ interests. It’s not surprising, but it does explain the growing differential in pay between senior and junior pilots. A quick look at the hourly pay charts at Airline Pilot Central will illustrate the gap.

And Sean, Smith, and others are right on about the hours worked. The pilot lifestyle is not cushy. It involves frequent high-stress operations, working far more hours than the clock shows, spending many nights away from home (half, on average), often working on the back side of the clock. There are long years flying RJs to places like Wichita and Fort Wayne. If a pilot can avoid getting furloughed or laid off, he might eventually get to fly widebodies on overseas routes, but the chances aren’t good. And if a pilot is laid off, he has to start at the beginning at another airline, in both pay and seniority — hardly a recipe for a middle-class mid-life. Little wonder so many pilots are dropping out of the industry altogether or doing like a pilot I know who is making a mid-career switch from Northwest to Emirates, where the prospects are much brighter.

So, to recap, airline pilot is a mostly working-class profession that requires middle-class credentials and that once upon a time allowed pilots to maintain a middle-class lifestyle.

[IMAGE]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Evan's Commentary | Tagged labor | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on July 16, 2008 at 4:49 pm Papa Kilo

    Great analogy ,

    As a recently retired Controller I can identify with the same issues. After MDW,ORD and GSO , I chose to work at SFB, a major training base for COMAIR/Delta/ASA, etc, as I headed into retirement.
    I have met many pilots in the tower tours, and in the long ago past, I rode jump-seat on 20 or so flights. For the most part I was welcomed and enjoyed the inter -action. We learned from each other. Sadly that was abused by many and canceled for controllers. After almost a year of retirement I miss the old days of interaction in your environment.

    What your readers, hopefully, recognize is the some of folks that created that airline A/B pay scales were hired on to the FAA and infused the same idiocy. I never made the money that is the median income that you quote, not even with the overtime, close, but only with the OT. I Never made what the FAA said I was. They keep getting raises new desks,couches,computers, Plasma tv’s and cash bonuses . Sound similar?

    Enough of my rant…I do miss you guys and gals…

    Papa Kilo
    8 years aircrew
    26 as controller


  2. on August 26, 2008 at 5:19 pm nick

    $150k a year average? That’s just not true. Not even close. I don’t know what airline they were looking at, or if they ignored all regional airlines, but the average airline pilot salary is not $150k.


  3. on August 26, 2008 at 10:51 pm Evan Sparks

    Nick,

    The BLS figure is accurate. But as I said above, it’s an average, not a median; an average is less useful for these purposes because a few large outliers in the sample can skew the mean. The average is skewed by a small segment of very senior pilots being paid in many cases on “A” scales, not the “B” scales that new hires got shunted onto. The median salary (not available in the BLS figures) is likely much lower.

    Thanks for reading!

    /E



Comments are closed.

  • Recently on the APB

    • America vs. Europe: who overrates whom?
    • Scare headline not so scary in article
    • Crew rest and training, new ATC contract, and more
    • The solution to NYC’s airport woes?
    • And… I’m back
    • Nothing to see here
    • Let your left hand not know what your right hand is doing….
    • Evan around the web
    • This is just ridiculous
    • Liveblogging Randy Babbitt’s confirmation hearing
  • 2008 aerospace airports air traffic control alitalia american asia ata atsb australia pacific Aviation08 BAA british airways budget airlines business canada competition congress consumer advocacy continental delays delta Deregulation 2.0 dot emirates energy environment europe faa fedex general aviation geography health history humor iata icao klm korean labor latin america lufthansa media Merger Mania 2008 mergers meta middle east middle east/africa military misc. nationalism network airlines northwest open skies politics prestige regulation ryanair safety sarcasm security small communities southwest Southwest and the FAA space tax transit travel tsa united usa us airways virgin virgin america world
  • Archives

    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
  • Find me on Facebook!
  • Banner photo: Washington during landing at National Airport, November 2007. © Rachel Ayerst. Used by permission.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Evan Sparks's Aviation Policy Blog
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Evan Sparks's Aviation Policy Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: