I’ve done several off-blog items on the subject of international airline alliances lately. Here they are:
International airline alliances in the spotlight
April 13, 2009 by Evan Sparks
Posted in Daily Departures | Tagged competition, congress, network airlines, regulation, world | 1 Comment
One Response
Comments are closed.
-
Recently on the APB
- America vs. Europe: who overrates whom?
- Scare headline not so scary in article
- Crew rest and training, new ATC contract, and more
- The solution to NYC’s airport woes?
- And… I’m back
- Nothing to see here
- Let your left hand not know what your right hand is doing….
- Evan around the web
- This is just ridiculous
- Liveblogging Randy Babbitt’s confirmation hearing
- 2008 aerospace airports air traffic control alitalia american asia ata atsb australia pacific Aviation08 BAA british airways budget airlines business canada competition congress consumer advocacy continental delays delta Deregulation 2.0 dot emirates energy environment europe faa fedex general aviation geography health history humor iata icao klm korean labor latin america lufthansa media Merger Mania 2008 mergers meta middle east middle east/africa military misc. nationalism network airlines northwest open skies politics prestige regulation ryanair safety sarcasm security small communities southwest Southwest and the FAA space tax transit travel tsa united usa us airways virgin virgin america world
Archives
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- Banner photo: Washington during landing at National Airport, November 2007. © Rachel Ayerst. Used by permission.
http://transportation.nationaljournal.com/2009/04/should-airline-oversight-be-ti.php?rss=1
Crandall has some good insights as usual.
Perhaps, my biggest take-away from Crandall’s position on ATI, Alliances and Foreign Ownership is that Foreign corporations have no interest in competing in our markets or in the proper development of our nation’s aviation infrastructure.
Crandall says that foreign operators are only interested in our largest populaton centers for the purposes of feeding THEIR international route networks.
Moving towards a situation where America’s aviation infrastructure becomes reliant on the profit/loss decisions of foreign operators is ludicrious if we are looking to use aviation as a lubricant of commerce and development.
Today’s executives don’t care about the future needs of America. They are in it for a short term payoff.
This is where it’s absolutely crucial for Public Policy Makers to step up to plate and offer forward looking vision.
I’d like to leave the public policy makers who read this with Crandall’s closing comment to YOU, during his June 10th Wings Club Speech.
THE UNITED STATES USED TO BE GOOD AT SOLVING PROBLEMS. THESE DAYS, WE DON’T SEEM UP TO THE JOB. I FIND THAT DISCOURAGING, AS I KNOW MANY OF YOU MUST. I DO HOPE, HOWEVER, THAT WHETHER YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE THOUGHTS I HAVE PRESENTED TODAY, YOU WILL BECOME AN ADVOCATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DEBATE ABOUT FINDING SOLUTIONS FOR OUR COMMERCIAL AIRLINE INDUSTRY.
These problems are not something you can leave to the “free market” which destroyed the financial industry. Doing your job requires you to offer precisely the kind of leadership that Oberstar is providing.
That Crandall agrees with Oberstar should give many of you great confidence in supporting his position.
Occam’s Razor